What is SAST and how does Static Application Security Testing work?

What Is SAST?

Static Application Security Testing (SAST), also known as static analysis or white-box testing, is a method of security testing that involves examining the source code of an application for vulnerabilities.  It's performed without executing the program and focuses on finding security flaws within the code itself. When aligning with Secure Software Development principles, integrating SAST falls under DevSecOps Best Practices, and thus, should be considered for implementation.

SAST is a vital component of software development that helps organizations proactively address security vulnerabilities and maintain high code quality standards. Its integration into the development process is crucial for the early detection and resolution of potential security issues and ensures that applications comply with standards.

‍

What are the benefits of Static Application Security Testing?

Amid rising cybersecurity challenges, SAST is vital for maintaining software security integrity. It also aids in adhering to industry standards and regulatory mandates for stringent security practices. SAST tools are a vital educational resource, emphasizing secure coding practices and familiarizing developers with common coding pitfalls. Its consistent application cultivates a culture of security awareness, reinforcing developers' sense of responsibility towards secure coding.

SAST enables Early Detection and Resolution

SAST enables developers to detect and fix security flaws early in the development process, preventing them from progressing further down the pipeline. With the rise of DevSecOps, SAST tools have adapted to fit agile and DevOps workflows smoothly. Typically, SAST is integrated into the CI/CD pipeline, facilitating continuous code analysis.

Integration and Automation in CI/CD Pipelines

As a key component of the 'shift-left' approach, SAST embeds security considerations from the outset of the development process. Its seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines ensures continuous security oversight. Furthermore, the automation of security checks through SAST increases the consistency and depth of security testing.

‍

How do SAST tools work?

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools meticulously examine an application's source code, pinpointing coding mistakes, security vulnerabilities, and compliance lapses. They aim to unearth potential vulnerabilities as early as possible during the software development. Early detection of such issues through SAST is crucial for averting possible security breaches and safeguarding against data leaks. The effectiveness of SAST tools depends on their ability to understand complex code structures and patterns. Typically, these tools are tailored to specific programming languages and frameworks, enhancing the accuracy and precision of their analysis.

Here are the details of how SAST tools work:

1. Source Code Input

• Code Access: SAST tools require access to the application's source code. This can include the entire codebase or specific components of it.
• Language Support: Different SAST tools support different programming languages and frameworks, so using a tool compatible with the application's development language is essential.

2. Parsing and Modeling

• Parsing Code: The tool parses the provided source code to understand its structure. This involves breaking down the code into fundamental elements like functions, classes, and variables.
• Creating Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs): The parsed code is typically converted into an AST, representing the source code's hierarchical structure in a tree-like format.

3. Static Analysis Techniques

• Pattern Matching: The tool scans the AST for patterns that match known vulnerabilities, such as SQL injection patterns or buffer overflow conditions.
• Data Flow Analysis: This involves tracking data flow through the code to identify insecure data handling, such as unsanitized user input in database queries.
• Control Flow Analysis: This examines the paths of execution through the code, looking for potential vulnerabilities like authentication bypasses or logic flaws.
• Semantic Analysis: The tool interprets the code's semantics or meaning, identifying complex vulnerabilities that are not just pattern-based.

4. Reporting and Results

• Vulnerability Identification: Identified issues are flagged as potential vulnerabilities, each typically categorized by type and severity.
• Detailed Reporting: SAST tools provide detailed reports of the findings, often with references to the specific lines of code where vulnerabilities were detected.
• Prioritization and Recommendations: Many tools also prioritize vulnerabilities based on their potential impact and provide recommendations for remediation.

5. Integration with Development Tools

• CI/CD Integration: SAST tools can be integrated into Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment pipelines, allowing for automated scanning with each code commit.
• IDE Integration: Some tools also integrate with Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), enabling developers to identify and fix issues in real time as they write code.

‍

Shortcomings of SAST and How DAST Complements It

While Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a powerful tool for identifying vulnerabilities in code, it has certain limitations. Understanding these shortcomings helps in effectively complementing SAST with Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) for a more holistic security approach.

1. Inability to Identify Runtime Vulnerabilities

• SAST Limitation: SAST analyzes static code and cannot detect issues that only manifest during runtime, like memory leaks, runtime permission issues, or authentication problems in a live environment.
• DAST Complement: DAST tests applications in their running state, identifying business logic vulnerabilities SAST might miss, including user interfaces, server configurations, and runtime interactions.

2. False Positives and Negatives

• SAST Limitation: SAST can sometimes generate false positives (identifying non-issues as vulnerabilities) and false negatives (missing actual vulnerabilities). This can lead to unnecessary work or overlooked security risks.
• DAST Complement: DAST provides a practical perspective by testing the application in real-world scenarios, which helps validate SAST findings and reduce the chances of false positives and negatives.

3. Limited Scope in Complex Integrations

• SAST Limitation: SAST may not effectively analyze vulnerabilities arising from complex interactions between various systems and components.
• DAST Complement: By testing the application as a whole, including interactions with other systems, DAST can uncover issues stemming from complex integrations and third-party services.

4. Lack of Contextual Understanding

• SAST Limitation: SAST lacks the context of how the application behaves in a production-like environment, potentially missing context-specific vulnerabilities.
• DAST Complement: DAST, by testing the application in an environment that closely mimics production, provides insights into how contextual factors affect security.

5. User Interaction and Workflow Vulnerabilities

• SAST Limitation: SAST cannot simulate user interactions and, therefore cannot identify vulnerabilities that occur during specific user workflows.
• DAST Complement: DAST actively interacts with the application from a user's perspective, identifying vulnerabilities during specific user actions or workflows.

6. Difficulty in Detecting Configuration and Deployment Issues

• SAST Limitation: Issues related to configuration and deployment settings are often beyond the scope of SAST.
• DAST Complement: DAST can identify misconfigurations and deployment-related vulnerabilities by interacting with the application in its deployed state.

7. Feedback and Remediation

• SAST Limitation: While SAST provides early feedback, it may not offer practical insights into how vulnerabilities can be exploited or impact the application in a live setting.
• DAST Complement: DAST’s feedback is grounded in the application's operational context, offering more actionable insights for remediation.

In conclusion, while SAST is invaluable for the early detection of code-level vulnerabilities, the limitations of SAST tools are effectively balanced by the strengths of DAST tools. The combination of SAST and DAST provides a more comprehensive and robust security testing regime, addressing various vulnerabilities from a static and dynamic perspective. This dual approach thoroughly assesses an application’s security posture, covering both pre-deployment and post-deployment scenarios.